conflict_id,date_flagged,kpi_id,canonical_kpi_name,doc_ids_affected,value_a,source_a,value_b,source_b,unit,conflict_type,resolution_notes,resolved_value,status
CNF-001,2026-05-12,KPI-027,NDC Additional Carbon Sink Target (2031–2035),NZN-002,3.5,KPI Registry (added after Run 1 — sourced from TERI report),4,Dashboard Bridge Run 2 — NZN-002 (MoEFCC NDC press release),billion tonnes CO₂e,Value Discrepancy,"Range confirmed: NDC states 3.5–4 billion tonnes CO₂e as a single commitment range. NotebookLM parsed the two ends of the range as separate conflicting values. KPI-027 definition and aliases updated to reflect range. Bridge rows for NZN-002 should use ""3.5–4"" as value.",3.5–4,Resolved — New Value
CNF-003,2026-05-13,KPI-041,Offshore Wind Auction Target by 2030,NZN-001 (Part 3),4,MNRE Annual Report 2024-25 Part 3 — SECI section (as SECI near-term tender target),37,KPI Registry (KPI-041) — sourced from MNRE national 2030 auction target,GW,Definition Mismatch,"4 GW likely refers to SECI's near-term offshore wind tender pipeline (Tamil Nadu + other states), while 37 GW refers to India's total offshore wind auction target by 2030 under the national policy. These are not the same metric. Recommend splitting into two KPIs: KPI-041 (national 2030 target: 37 GW) and KPI-116 (SECI Tamil Nadu tender: 500 MW already logged). Verify 4 GW figure against SECI's specific offshore wind tender documents.

Resolution confirmed 2026-05-19: 4 GW = SECI near-term offshore wind tender pipeline (Tamil Nadu seabed lease, first tender issued early 2024); 37 GW = India's total offshore wind auction trajectory through FY2029-30 under MNRE national policy (Model A: 1 GW + Model B: 14 GW + Model C: 22 GW). Not a conflict — two distinct metrics. KPI-041 headline value confirmed as 37 GW. KPI-116 (SECI Tamil Nadu, 500 MW) is the first-tender sub-entry. A new KPI for ""First Offshore Wind Tender Issued"" (4 GW seabed lease) may be added if needed.",37,Resolved — Definition Split
CNF-004,2026-05-18,KPI-009,GHG Emission Reduction Achieved,NZN-007; NZN-006; NZN-012,33,SDG India Index 2023-24 (NITI Aayog) — SDG indicator for period 2005–2019,36,MoEFCC / BUR / NDC reporting — emission intensity reduction by 2020 vs 2005 baseline,%,Definition Mismatch,"Not a true conflict. Different end-years produce different values: 33% covers 2005–2019 (SDG Index methodology); 36% covers 2005–2020 (BUR/NDC reported figure). Both are correct within their respective measurement periods. NZN-007 row to be relabelled as ""GHG Emission Intensity Reduction — SDG Index Indicator."" KPI-009 canonical value remains 36% (2020, vs 2005 baseline) as the primary NDC-aligned figure.",36 (KPI-009 canonical); 33 retained as SDG Index sub-indicator,Resolved — Definition Split
CNF-005,2026-05-18,KPI-137,Forest and Tree Cover — Total Percentage,NZN-007; NZN-008; NZN-013,24.62,SDG India Index 2023-24 (NITI Aayog) — forest cover indicator per SDG measurement methodology,25.17,FSI India State of Forest Report (ISFR) 2023 — forest + tree cover combined (MoEFCC standard),%,Definition Mismatch,"Not a true conflict. Same reference year (2023) but different perimeters: 24.62% uses a forest-only definition per SDG indicator methodology; 25.17% is the FSI standard combining forest cover + tree cover outside forests. NZN dashboard headline value: 25.17% (FSI ISFR 2023, primary MoEFCC source). NZN-007 row to be relabelled as ""Forest Cover — SDG Index Indicator (Excluding Tree Cover Outside Forests)."" KPI-137 definition updated to note both figures.",25.17 (KPI-137 canonical); 24.62 retained as SDG Index sub-indicator,Resolved — Definition Split
CNF-006,2026-05-29,KPI-015,Number of States in 'Front Runner' Category,NZN-018,4,SEEI 2024 PIB — body text listing top performers (one per energy consumption group),32,"SDG India Index 2023-24 (KPI-015 canonical value, NZN-011)",Count,Definition Mismatch,"4 = group-wise top performers in SEEI (one winner per energy consumption group), not states scoring >60% in SEEI. Not comparable to KPI-015 which tracks SDG Front Runner states. Bridge row deleted. No update to KPI-015 required.",32 (KPI-015 unchanged),Resolved — Definition Split
CNF-007,2026-06-02,KPI-286,Battery Energy Storage System — VGF Target,NZN-025,4000,LT-LEDS 2022 (MoEFCC),13000,NZN-017 (MoP Year-End Review),MWh,Definition Mismatch,LT-LEDS 2022 cited an earlier near-term VGF deployment target; KPI-286 reflects the expanded scheme target from MoP. Different phases — both correct.,,
CNF-008,2026-06-03,KPI-010,Carbon Sink / Forest & Tree Cover,NZN-030; NZN-024,1.97,MoEFCC Annual Report 2023-24 (additional carbon sink achieved as of 2021),2.29,NDC 2031-35 (NZN-024) — carbon sink created 2005–2021,billion tonne CO2eq,Definition Mismatch,Both figures cover 2005–2021 period but differ. 1.97 Bt likely refers to forest+tree cover sink only; 2.29 Bt from NDC 2031-35 may include broader land use sinks. Recommend checking MoEFCC primary BUR source to confirm perimeter. Log as open pending verification.,,Resolved — Value B Used
CNF-010,2026-06-10,KPI-630 / KPI-769,Total GHG Emissions — Waste Sector,NZN-044; NZN-053,76,BUR-4 (NZN-044) — India's Fourth Biennial Update Report to UNFCCC,95.32,TNC 2023 (NZN-053) — India's Third National Communication to UNFCCC,MtCO2e,Value Discrepancy,"Both sources report 2020 as the reference year and both are primary UNFCCC submissions from MoEFCC. Possible causes: (1) different IPCC category scope — BUR-4 may use a narrower waste definition vs TNC's broader coverage including industrial wastewater; (2) methodological revision between BUR-4 and TNC submissions; (3) rounding or reporting perimeter difference. Recommend cross-checking waste sector sub-category tables in both documents. Until resolved, retain both values with [CHECK] flags on respective Bridge rows. Do not use either as the canonical figure for dashboard display.",,Open
CNF-011,2026-06-11,KPI-492 vs KPI-913,Protected Area Coverage — % of Geographic Area,NZN-030; NZN-065,5.28,MoEFCC Annual Report 2023-24 (NZN-030) — Bridge rows 626 and 645; as of 2023-24; 998 protected areas,5.32,"WII National Wildlife Database Centre (NWIS) via PIB Backgrounder NoteId 153834 (NZN-065) — Bridge rows 1148 and 1150; as of 27 Nov 2023; 1,014 protected areas",%,Value Discrepancy,"ONE conflict, two expressions: the percentage divergence (5.28 vs 5.32) is derived from a count divergence (998 vs 1,014 protected areas) that no cell previously recorded. The count is the load-bearing half. A protected-area network does not shrink, yet MoEFCC AR 2023-24 (period ending Mar-2024) reports FEWER areas than WII NWDC recorded on 27 Nov 2023 — so this is not a methodology difference in the way the original note assumed. Most likely the annual report restates an earlier WII snapshot; 998 was the WII figure around 2022-23. Not confirmed. Composition check available: WII gives 1,014 as 106 national parks + 573 wildlife sanctuaries + 115 conservation reserves + 220 community reserves; no exclusion of a single class yields 998, which rules out a definitional-perimeter explanation. Action: establish the as-of date behind the MoEFCC 998 figure, then either resolve as a vintage split or as a genuine conflict. Original recommendation retained: if a single figure is ever needed, WII NWDC is the more granular and more current lineage. Both retained; neither suppressed. Superseded registry duplicates KPI-911/912/913 now point to KPI-129/024/492 — this conflict sits on KPI-492 and KPI-129.",,Open
CNF-010-U1,2026-06-22,KPI-630 / KPI-769,Total GHG Emissions — Waste Sector,NZN-070,117.54,BTR-1 2022 (NZN-070) — 2006 IPCC Guidelines,—,—,MtCO2e,Update Note,"UPDATE (NZN-070, 2026-06-22): BTR-1 reports Waste Sector 2022 = 117.54 MtCO2e under 2006 IPCC Guidelines — same methodology as BUR-4. Supports BUR-4 (76 MtCO2e) as the correct 2006-IPCC-aligned figure for 2020. TNC 95.32 likely reflects older IPCC methodology. Recommend BUR-4 as 2020 dashboard primary.",,
CNF-012,2026-08-06,KPI-003,Total Installed Renewable Energy Capacity,NZN-001; NZN-013; NZN-075; NZN-076,209.44,MNRE Annual Report 2024-25 (NZN-001) — Bridge row 4; RE excluding large hydro,263.19,MoP capacity release 15-Feb-2026 (NZN-075) — Bridge row 1264; restated in NZN-013 Bridge row 232; RE including large hydro,GW,Definition Split,"RESOLVED on NZN-076. MNRE 14-Jul-2025 release annexure reports all three bases on a single date (30-Jun-2025): 184.62 GW RE excluding large hydro, 234.00 GW RE including large hydro, 242.78 GW non-fossil. Both Jan-2026 figures are therefore correct on their own basis and are not a value conflict: 209.44 GW is MNRE RE-excluding-large-hydro, 263.19 GW is MoP RE-including-large-hydro. Action: append basis qualifier to the Year / Period or split under KPI-003 vs KPI-397 (Total Installed Renewable Energy Capacity (incl. Large Hydro)) so the two series never sit under one name. Both retained. Confirms D-016 lineage rule: NZN-013 row 232 is Restated from NZN-075, so 263.19 has ONE primary lineage, not two.","209.44 (KPI-003, excl. large hydro) and 263.19 (KPI-397, incl. large hydro) — both canonical on their own basis",Resolved — Definition Split
CNF-013,2026-08-06,KPI-009,GHG Emission Reduction Achieved,NZN-006,7.93,"WSDS 2025 inaugural address, MoEFCC (NZN-006) — Bridge row 121",36,"Same source NZN-006 Bridge row 119, name variant ""GHG Emission Reduction (vs 2005 baseline)""; corroborated by NZN-008 row 125 and NZN-012 row 193",%,Value Discrepancy,"INTERNAL to one source: NZN-006 carries both 7.93% and 36% for 2020 vs 2005. 36% is the NDC-reported emission INTENSITY reduction (GDP-normalised) and is corroborated across three documents. 7.93% is an outlier with no corroborating row anywhere in the registry and is most likely a different metric (absolute emissions change, or a single-year figure) recorded under the intensity name. CNF-004 covers 33% vs 36% (SDG Index period difference) and does NOT cover this row. Action: re-read NZN-006 against the primary address text to establish what 7.93% measures; if it is a distinct metric it needs its own KPI, if it is a transcription error the row is deleted. Secondary defect for OI-004: rows 119 and 121 are two names for KPI-009 within one document — same identifier-fragmentation class as D-017 and D-018.",,Open
CNF-014,2026-08-06,KPI-004,RE Share of Total Installed Power Capacity,NZN-012; NZN-013,22.13,"MoSPI SDG publications, 19th Statistics Day (NZN-012) — Bridge row 194, FY2025; series pair with 16.02% FY2016 (row 195)",51.55,"PIB Research Unit backgrounder ""India’s Green Pathway"" (NZN-013) — Bridge row 231, as of Nov-2025",%,Definition Mismatch,"Not reconcilable as one series. The NZN-012 pair moves 16.02% (FY2016) to 22.13% (FY2025); installed capacity share over the same window moved roughly 30% to 46%, so 22.13% is almost certainly NOT an installed-capacity share and the row name is misassigned. Most likely an SDG National Indicator Framework energy indicator (renewable share of total final energy consumption, or a generation share). Action: verify indicator 7.2.1 wording in the MoSPI source; if confirmed, row 194 and row 195 move to a new KPI with the correct basis in the name per D-019, and KPI-004 keeps the capacity basis only. Do not average, do not pick one — the two are different quantities.",,Open
CNF-015,2026-08-06,KPI-004,RE Share of Total Installed Power Capacity,NZN-013; NZN-075; NZN-076,51.55,"NZN-013 stated value, Bridge row 231, as of Nov-2025, labelled renewable share",50.56 renewable / 52.25 non-fossil,"Computed from NZN-013’s own Jan-2026 capacity rows: 263,190 MW RE (row 232) and 271,970 MW non-fossil (RE + 8,780 MW nuclear, row 235) against 520,510.95 MW total (row 233)",%,Definition Mismatch,"INTERNAL inconsistency in NZN-013. Its own arithmetic closes (248,541.62 MW fossil + 271,970 MW non-fossil = 520,511.62 MW against a stated 520,510.95 MW total, 0.67 MW rounding), so the capacity rows are self-consistent and the stated 51.55% is the outlier. Vintages differ (51.55% is Nov-2025, capacity rows are Jan-2026), so this is not a straight contradiction. RECOMMENDATION, not yet confirmed: 51.55% is the NON-FOSSIL share, not the renewable share. NZN-076 puts non-fossil at 50.08% on 30-Jun-2025 and NZN-013 implies 52.25% at Jan-2026, so a Nov-2025 non-fossil value of 51.55% sits on that trajectory, while the RE-only trajectory would land near 49-50%. Action: confirm against the NZN-013 source text, then relabel row 231 to the non-fossil KPI (KPI-382) or add the basis to the name per D-019. Held Under Review pending operator confirmation — the trajectory argument is inference, not a source reading.",,Under Review
CNF-016,2026-08-06,KPI-299,Per Capita Electricity Consumption,NZN-017; NZN-026; NZN-046,1395,"Year End Review 2024, Ministry of Power (NZN-017) — Bridge row 394, FY2023-24",1106,"Energy Statistics India 2025, MoSPI (NZN-026) — Bridge row 511, FY2023-24",kWh,Definition Mismatch,"Same period, two ministries, 289 kWh apart. Third data point breaks the tie on shape: NZN-046 (SDG NIF Progress Report 2024) reports 1,331 kWh for 2022-23 (Bridge row 828), which runs continuously into MoP’s 1,395 kWh for FY2023-24 and not into MoSPI’s 1,106 kWh. Baselines also differ — MoP anchors to 957 kWh FY2013-14 (row 395), MoSPI to 748 kWh FY2014-15 (row 512), and both pairs are internally consistent, which is the signature of two different measurement bases rather than an error. Expected resolution: MoP reports gross per-capita availability (generation basis) and MoSPI reports net per-capita final consumption (after transmission and distribution losses). Action: confirm the definitional footnote in Energy Statistics India 2025, then split into two KPIs with the basis in the name per D-019. Both series retained.",,Under Review
CNF-017,2026-08-06,KPI-484 / KPI-649,Total Carbon Stock in Forests,NZN-030; NZN-034; NZN-046,7285.5,"India State of Forest Report 2023, FSI (NZN-034) — Bridge row 701, unit million tonnes",30430,"SDG National Indicator Framework Progress Report 2024, MoSPI (NZN-046) — Bridge row 846, unit million tonnes carbon",million tonnes,Definition Split,"2026-08-17 (S-035): RESOLVED — Definition Split. ISFR 2023 Volume 1 states forest carbon stock as 7,285.5 Mt and separately states that, for NDC target monitoring, India has reached 30.43 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent; the MoEFCC release attributes that figure to Forest and Tree Cover. Different perimeters, different quantities. Neither figure was wrong — the unit label on Bridge row 846 was, and it came from KPI-649, whose definition asserted the figure was carbon rather than CO2 equivalent. Row 846 corrected to million tonne CO2eq; KPI-649 name, unit and definition corrected. The 4.2x ratio is not explained by a 44/12 conversion of the forest-only figure; the source states no perimeter arithmetic and none is asserted here. Resolving evidence: NZN-034 (ISFR 2023 Vol 1) plus MoEFCC PIB NoteId 153608 — not yet held as a Doc ID.
Both rows cite ISFR 2023, so this cannot be a vintage difference. FSI’s series is internally coherent: 7,204 million tonnes in 2021 (NZN-030 row 637) rising to 7,285.5 in 2023, with the stated increase of 81.5 million tonnes (row 702) matching the difference exactly. 30,430 is roughly 4.2 times 7,285.5, which is close to the carbon-to-CO2 conversion factor of 3.67 applied to a wider perimeter — consistent with a CO2-equivalent figure for forest AND tree cover rather than a carbon figure for forest only. If so the unit label on row 846 (million tonnes carbon) is wrong. The registry already carries the split — KPI-484 and KPI-649 (Total Carbon Stock in Forests — Carbon Units) — and the two Bridge rows may be assigned to the wrong side of it. Action: read the MoSPI indicator footnote, correct the unit, and reassign row 846. Do not display either figure until the unit is settled — a 4x unit error is the most publication-dangerous item in this batch.","Both retained: 7,285.5 million tonnes carbon (KPI-484, forest only) and 30.43 billion tonnes CO2 equivalent (KPI-649, forest and tree cover, NDC basis)",Resolved — Definition Split
CNF-018,2026-08-06,KPI-205,National Green India Mission — Funds Released Since FY2015-16,NZN-013; NZN-030,944.48,MoEFCC Annual Report 2023-24 (NZN-030) — Bridge row 630,982.34,"PIB Research Unit backgrounder, Apr-2026 (NZN-013) — Bridge row 228, graded Sole-source",₹ crore,Value Discrepancy,"A later cut-off would explain 944.48 rising to 982.34, and the two documents are two years apart — but the paired area-planted figure is IDENTICAL in both (155,130 hectares, rows 227 and 629), which is what weakens the vintage reading: a genuinely later cut-off should move both. Either the area figure was carried forward unchanged into the newer document while funds were updated, or one of the two funds figures is wrong. Both rows carry the same under-specified period (""Since FY2015-16"") with no as-of date, which is what makes this unresolvable from the file alone. Action: add an as-of date to the Year / Period on both rows, then verify 982.34 against a MoEFCC primary — NZN-013 is derivative and holds this figure Sole-source, so there is currently no independent lineage behind it.",,Open
CNF-019,2026-08-06,KPI-528,NCAP — Total Funding Allocated (Cumulative),NZN-032; NZN-049,19711,"CPCB Annual Report 2024-25 (NZN-032) — Bridge row 683, period FY2019-20 to FY2025-26",19614.44,"Rajya Sabha Q&A, MoEFCC, Shri Kirti Vardhan Singh (NZN-049) — Bridge row 904, same period, row already carries a CHECK flag",₹ crore,Value Discrepancy,"Identical stated period, 96.56 crore apart, from two government sources of different type — a parliamentary answer against the implementing agency’s annual report. Neither is derivative of the other, so this is two distinct primary lineages disagreeing, which under D-016 is the strongest class of conflict the registry can hold. The same source pair also diverges on NCAP cities conforming to NAAQS (15 in FY2022-23 per NZN-032 row 681 against 18 in FY2023-24 per NZN-049 row 905) — different periods there, so not a conflict, but it confirms the two documents track the same programme on different cut-offs. Action: check whether the parliamentary answer states allocated-versus-released or a different terminal year. Retain both; do not publish a cumulative NCAP allocation figure until resolved.",,Open
CNF-020,2026-08-14,KPI-209,Total Power Generation Capacity — India,NZN-026; NZN-078,441970,"CEA Growth of Electricity Sector in India 1947-2025 (NZN-078) — Bridge row 1365, Primary",442897,"Energy Statistics India 2025, MoSPI (NZN-026) — Bridge row 506",MW,Value Discrepancy,"Open. Same date (31-Mar-2024), two government sources, 927 MW apart. NZN-026's solar, wind, large hydro and nuclear component rows (503, 504, 505, 508) match CEA exactly, so NZN-026 restates CEA and still diverges on the total — the divergence is in the aggregate, not the underlying data. CEA's own figures reconcile to its stated total exactly (243,217 fossil + 8,180 nuclear + 190,573 RES = 441,970); NZN-026's do not (441,902 against a stated 442,897, 995 MW unaccounted). That reconciliation is arithmetic on the Bridge, not a source reading, and does not resolve the conflict under §10. Paired with CNF-021, which is the same document pair on the RES aggregate. Surfaced in RUN-070; written 2026-08-14.",,
CNF-021,2026-08-14,KPI-397,Total Installed Renewable Energy Capacity (incl. Large Hydro),NZN-026; NZN-078,190573,"CEA Growth of Electricity Sector in India 1947-2025 (NZN-078) — Bridge row 1373, Primary",190511,"Energy Statistics India 2025, MoSPI (NZN-026) — Bridge row 514",MW,Value Discrepancy,"Open. Same date (31-Mar-2024), 62 MW apart, from the same document pair as CNF-020 and almost certainly the same underlying cause. Large hydro agrees exactly between the two sources (46,928 MW, rows 505 and 1371), so the divergence sits in the non-hydro RES component. Resolution requires a source that states how MoSPI aggregates RES for Energy Statistics India — whether the perimeter differs from CEA's, or whether one is a later revision of the same CEA dataset. Not resolvable by trajectory or arithmetic (§10).",,